Roger Patterson's Deathbed Confession


The guy who tweeted this message to Matt Moneymaker has no idea what he's talking so we're going to put it to rest for him right here. Roger Patterson never confessed to saying anything about his famous 1967 film being faked. This is a misconception and a very common one at that. This has been a urban legend and it stems from a mix-up from an article about a guy who photographed the Loch Ness monster who on his deathbed, did in fact confessed he hoaxed it. Moneymaker address this on his website on BFRO.net:

Deathbed Confession?

The most commonly heard false fact about the Patterson footage:

"The guy who got the footage admitted on his deathbed that he faked it."

This is not true. This is a mixup. Here's how the mixup started.

The man who obtained the most well known photo of the Loch Ness monster (not bigfoot) admitted on his deathbed that he faked that photo.

The story of his confession popped up in newspaper headlines around the world. The story didn't last long as a news item, but every new agency, in every country, on every continent, ran the story.

The story mutated in the press, from a crypto story about one photo from Loch Ness being debunked, to "Mystery of Loch Ness Finally Solved."

Around the country and around the world people were interested to hear that the famous monster mystery was solved, because the most famous monster photo had been debunked.

Frame 352 from the Patterson footage is the most famous, purportedly authentic, "monster" photo known to most Americans. They are more familiar with that than with the 1930's photo from Loch Ness.

This was the foundation for some of the confusion. It got worse later.

The Patterson footage was mistakenly associated with a "deathbed confession" related to a famous "monster" mystery.

The Loch Ness deathbed confession story grabbed such big headlines, it was inevitable that someone would try the same formula down the line. It only took a few more years.

The heirs of a man named Ray Wallace initially reported his "deathbed confession" about faking the first famous bigfoot tracks in Northern California.

Ray Wallace left behind a few pairs of wooden feet for making fake tracks. He would sell plaster casts of fake tracks at his roadside tourist shop.

His heirs later recanted the "deathbed confession" part of the story, and instead said they "just know he started the whole thing."

The initial "deathbed confession" element helpd get the story onto the AP Wire. It became "The Father of Bigfoot Dies".

The story was circulated word-of-mouth and similarly transformed into a story about the Patterson footage.

The Patterson still images are the most famous images associated with bigfoots.

The Wallace story had to do with the most famous track casts.

The track casts were obtained 10 years before the Patterson footage.

The Wallace story didn't have anything to do with the Patterson footage.


Wallace's heirs were well aware that the Loch Ness "deathbed confession" made world headlines years earlier. They were just taking advantage of an opportunity.

Ray Wallace did not start the bigfoot mystery. He was not involved in the first track finds either. Graphic evidence disproves the claims of Ray's opportunistic heirs.

For more info on the Wallace family, click here.

The man who obtained the Patterson footage, Roger Patterson, died of cancer in the early 1970's. He was emphatic to the end that he filmed a real animal in October 1967.

The man who was with Patterson at the time, Bob Gimlin, is still alive. He is also adamant that it was a real animal.


If you chat about the bigfoot subject with a group of people, someone will jump in and claim they heard "the guy who got that famous footage admitted before he died that he faked it."

Try it sometime.

There are no written sources whatsoever suggesting Patterson admitted to a hoax on his deathbed. No one in his family has ever claimed that Roger admitted to a hoax before his death. All of the assertions in that regard began circulating after the Loch Ness story came out.

This mixup story has become an urban legend.

Comments

  1. What did Paul Freeman say on his death bed?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Uncdodger had a skeptical threesome with Parnassus and James Randi.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i don t like mmat monymaker but hr he right rogr di not said that bulSHITT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3rd g of gurl? Only way you still up

      Delete
    2. iM no t by myself buT BED Real soon.sti ll havee so me 4 morming.

      Delete
  4. Skeptic naysayers just make things up. That's all they've got in relation to the PGF. They have no ape suit, they have no evidence, only claims they make up.

    It's really hilarious that these skeptic nuts sitting around in their tinfoil hats call everyone else nuts.

    What are the opinions of nuts worth?

    You decide.

    Skeptics and naysayers also don't understand that many believers or those 'interested' are also skeptics. They are skeptical of reports and photos and videos that appear, and reject many of them.

    It isn't a skeptics vs. believers arrangement. Once you grasp that many believers are skeptical, it will go much better for you.

    Okay, everyone calm down now!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. stfu mulder/kerchak

      I've yet to see a believer present a remotely skeptical approach to the bigfoot.

      Delete
    2. Bigfoot is a "woo" topic. Deal with it.

      Delete
    3. It's only woo if you approach it with ove gloves or a magnetic bracelet.

      Telling the kids there was no Santa Claus in Bluff Creek that day is about as traumatic as ripping off a bandaid.

      No More No Less.

      Delete
    4. True skeptics are not believers OR naysayers. Please don't lump us in with the crazies.

      Delete
  5. It was a fake. Thanks for supporting and bleeving in me, but it was a hoax from the get go.

    In this day and age, what with the enhancements and the stablizations and the cibas and whatnot, I can't accept that you simps are still buying into it.

    Heck, Bills Munn has even stated there's a suit, yet some yokels are currently insisting elsewhere there can't be a suit. If there was a suit, it would have been used more than once they say.

    In other and exact words, if ole Roger Patterson only hoaxed the bigfoot once, then it must be real.

    This shit has got to stop people.

    Go ask BobG. He knows the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It has stopped already, lots of experts helped prove it no hoax from Krantz to Meldrum to Davis.

      Delete
    2. Wow man! Did the government beam that info directly into your head with microwaves? Fluoride?
      Watchout... here comes the black helicopters.

      Delete
  6. I'd like to hear from someone who actually bought a car from Bobgimlin back in the day. I'd like to know how that worked out for them.

    Some of you sure bought the fuck outta Roger Patterson, and he was only selling a guy in a suit.

    His vehicle ran out of gas as soon as he showed it to a scientific body.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Americans love the bad guy turned good story.

      "Against all odds and initial bad intentions, Roger Patterson gets the shot of a lifetime and it changes his life"

      Oh how silly you footers are.

      Delete
    2. No doubt it changed his life, and the lives of his family.

      Problem is there are too many borderline personalities who worship Roger's word as gospel.

      Do you treat these 'special' people with kid gloves or send them out in the back forty to dig fucking holes to set them straight?

      Delete
    3. Gimlin may have had to sign an NDA as part of an agreement/settlement. He may be bound to that, or just enjoys the paychecks now n then. Who knows, except him.

      Great hoax, and great story teller. Definitely an important part of american history.

      Delete
    4. I bought a Gremlin from Bob Gimlin back in '79. Still runs like a champ. Lifted it an inch, thing is pure pussy.

      Delete
    5. No use trolls it's been proven a real squatch dozens of times over by now, suit experts and scientists from around the world have studied it in fine detail and found no signs of fakery.

      Delete
    6. Claims it was a hoax and claims it was proven real in the same thread! With no facts to support either claim.
      What's an objective skepic to believe?

      Delete
    7. There is plenty proof of the hoax. Pattersons beard growth from clean shaven to dense beard in a matter of hours according to their story from the casting scene, (allegedly showing the film subjects imprint being cast by Patterson from "reel 2") and the cast display scene (Patterson by a large tree holding up a left and right plaster cast) allegedly both filmed at Bluff Creek oct 20th, again according to their story.

      The impossible film development timeline. According to their story filmed on Oct 20th (Friday) and developed and shown that Sunday. Kodak had a special process for developing that kind of film (kodachrome) that requires a very expensive machine (around a million dollars at that time) and a special process that was patented and licensed to kodak. Meaning other labs couldnt use their process, if they managed to acquire one of the very expensive and specific machines to do it with. The closest lab doing that film in 67 was in Palo Alto California. They are closed on the weekend, as were all the kodak processing plants that did kodachrome. (they didnt operate on Saturdays or Sundays) Also, the film was likely mailed to the processing plant and then back.

      How about those faked footprints?

      http://pgfhoax.blogspot.com/

      You can keep looking the other way, its ok :)

      Bob H came out a long time ago, and Gimlin will not do an interview with Bob H in the same room. Bob H says he will. Wonder why?

      Delete
    8. Hey Mr Patterson, where'd you get that film developed sir? "uhm... uhh, I can't tell ya" *insert random excuse here*

      Roger Patterson: "a bigfoot picked up one end of my VW!"

      Delete
    9. You're reaching. None of this has ever been established. Its all just claims to fit a pre-established conclusion. You sound like a believer, using the same low standard of proof. …

      Delete
    10. ^The film development timeline is ridiculous. Its a possible fatal blow against authenticity,not a reach, and is probably one of the reasons the Americans scientists didn't want to give the film a viewing.

      Delete
    11. @12:54:00

      Research it. What he said is true. You're the one guessing.

      Delete
    12. I prefer my fucks non tard, thanks. }-)

      Delete
    13. You're just another a dreaming troll River wrong like all the other losers, the film's been examined so many times now and never once debunked.

      Delete
  7. Gimlin did say there was a confession before Rogers death. Roger admitted he used a look-a-like Gimlin on his North American tour when Gimlin refused to attend.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That wasn't a deathbed confession at all, Gimlin knew that years earlier and was quite upset about it for a while as I understand it but he forgave his friend.

      Delete
  8. Cite sources or it didn't happen.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think Matt is correct about how the surgeon's photo story got mixed up with the PGF. He is off about the Wallace story, though. On the BFRO site Matt makes the mistake of comparing Ray's alleged Onion Mountain fake feet with the 1958 Crew prints. The fact is Wallace was a repeat hoaxer who had several sets of stompers, and almost certainly hoaxed both tracks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Right before he died Roger Patterson touched my no-no at church youth camp.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story