We now know why Dr. Melba Ketchum refuses to name the "double digit co-authors many with PhDs and some University Heads of Departments" involved in her Bigfoot DNA study. For Ketchum and her co-authors, it's a team effort, and she is the sacrificial lamb who's protecting them from the possibility of ridicule. It appears the team is all-in at this point, and they're confident about their paper. "Our entire team is in agreement or we wouldn't be publishing a paper. This is not my paper, it is OUR paper," Ketchum wrote today on Facebook in regards to a post about the theory that Bigfoot is a human-hybrid.
In the thread, Ketchum also explains why it's unnecessary to protect her co-authors:
I didn't mean to sound harsh and I apologize, but this is a team effort and I am the point man so to speak. With all that has transpired, I have been extremely careful not to divulge their names of my co-authors. They have families and jobs that would be threatened by the vicious attacks that would be sure to come prior to publication. So there is the appearance of the project just being being me out there but that is the farthest thing from the truth. We all played integral parts in making this come together. - Dr. Melba Ketchum
wow im first again!
ReplyDeleteBecause you wrote the damn piece!
DeleteNice
DeleteKetchum said all this on her last Coast 2 Coast interview. It makes sense. She doesn't want to bring grief the the rest of the team. 1st of Feb the paper is published, my prediction.
DeleteShe should write a paper on Bigcock because I got a dick with the circumference of a juvenile Squatch thigh. If I ever meet Ketchum I'm going to Squatch that pussaaaaaaaaaay!
Delete1st of Feb what year?
Delete2014 silly. That's the year of 'Sasquatch Cock in Ketchum Cootch'.
DeleteTrust me on this, nothing will be proven by Ketchum, and she does NOT have multiple PHDs working on her bullshit research paper. There is no evidence for Squatch, all that will happen is more excuses and more stringing along of gullible Footers, until she runs completely out of money and/or is ridiculed into science.
DeleteYou people are lost, I'm trying to lead you back to reality. Forget what you think you know or have seen, Squatch does NOT exist, sorry. And all replies of "I've seen it" are no different than all other evidence or proof; unless youve got a unique body part, its meaningless so dont bother.
No, this year, one more month. I'm going out on the skinny part of the limb, but sticking with it. We'll be arguing about the interpretation of the dna study in a month. Check it off.
DeleteInto Silence, not science...she doesnt know what "science is" LOL
DeleteDid Melba write that she is actually a man?
Delete@6:09...how is it that you know what science is?
DeleteYou're just an anonymous nobody. Somebody who can use blogging to feel"superior" a little self esteem boost for your unaccomplished life. You probably bully kids at school and on the bus every chance you get, as long as they're half your size.
Bigfoot is BS, is that you Sharon Hill? I Doubt It of Doubtful News?
DeleteYou have a real problem, and I think your "ridiculed into science" was an interesting Freudian slip.
I don't think it's Ketchum here who doesn't know what science is.
Thanks but we don't need your help. Go back to your doubtful news where you can sit happily in your box avoiding all evidence and simply doubting everything in existence.
You haven't acheived anything greater than the poop and tater guys on here. Give it a rest.
Go make your PGF redux for 2014, then come and talk to us in one year. Until then, your words and points are useless, wasteful speculation.
Czar, I'm almost certain that BIB is not Sharon Hill. I read her blog a few times as well as some of her comments on Rand(she uses her real name there). Hill's posts have a humorous touch and are not confrontational like BIB's.
DeleteI think Sharon Hill is hot looking no matter what she says.
DeleteShe is cute, no doubt about that.....
DeleteBiB you're one of the last trolls we're ever gonna trust on this you jealous loser bitch.
Delete#looneytoons approved
ReplyDeleteShawn hates you, looneytoons
DeleteIs that you, Sharon Hill, I Doubt It?
DeleteIf Ketchum is a vet and a lover of animals, (assuming she loves animals) as well as, a Bigfoot believer, wouldn't she want to protect BF? While she is sitting back suposively protecting her co-authors there are mythical forest creatures out there being shot in the back of the head and held prisoner in research labs. All this shit going on and she is yammering about some simplton pencil drawing. Damn, by the time she shows her evidence, the mythical creatures may well be extinct. LMAO
DeleteZERO EVIDENCE, of any back yard dewling pancake eating, mind raping, three pixels Squaches ANYWHERE EVER!! Its truly hesterical come on here and read what you Bigfootery idiots are writing about!!!
keep blogging your stupid crap, its funnier than all get out!
+1 for three pixels.
Deletelmao- must be a 12 year old as laughing ass off bis inmpossible and stupid. daft fucker!
DeleteYeah funny that you can sit and call anyone stupid while misspelling so many words I lost count you should put your golden butt plug back in your brain needs more stimulation
Delete7:31 troll headed for a breakdown.
DeleteReally? I just give up. There is no paper, there is no study, there is no daisy in a box, hell there probably isn't even a shawn running this blog.
ReplyDeleteAnd you don't exist either so shut the fuck up already!
Deleteyou forgot there is no bigfoot
DeleteIs this some kinda internal dialogue with the voices in your head?
DeleteYep I often post anonymous for all the other voices in my head. But as bears are real for the person running my speech. So hey asshole 1 of the 6 of me are real and 5 of the 6 of me can kick your ass. Plus I'm a girl so you Shut the fuck up 3:55
DeleteChutack,chutack,respect man girl
DeletePre-op tranny does not make you a girl...
DeleteYour not a girl moron
DeleteTrue dat.True dat.
DeleteThe only thing I beleive in is Harry Bandini
ReplyDeleteHe prefers to go by Fagbini.
DeleteFYI
whats with all the gay slurs,you coming out?
DeletePulling out.
Deleteok,rock yer sox auf
DeleteEnoch ya! M K Davees big man in world. Where him. Yahchuck ya!
ReplyDeleteYeeeee Yeeeeee
DeleteI believe there is a podcast tonight with Dr.Sarmiento.
ReplyDeleteYup sure is.
DeleteWhere? We wanna hear that, thank you.
DeleteWhat does that little blurb before the article have anything to do with the article?
ReplyDeletewho knows its all toons
DeleteIm having a real hard time finding an explanation for this..
ReplyDeleteim not, its toons
DeleteKetchum? I've seen her. She's here.
Deletewww.cornholinghashbrowns5964mom.com
Deleteany funny looney bff quotes this week?
ReplyDeletePatty is the real deal, folks.
DeleteThat's all I got. Been a slow news week over there.
Kerchak
DeleteOf course they carry weight. Even a blind man can tell by those comparisons that Patty's forehead slopes back above the brow ridge, whereas Bob H's does not.
It's IMPOSSIBLE for Bob H to have been Patty.
How can you not see that? Is it because you don't 'want' to?
Kerchak
DeleteScribbles? He was comparing Patty's head shape to Bob H's and posted two stills to make his point. It wasn't a scribble.
Patty's forehead slopes back above the brow ridge. Bob H's goes almost straight up.
Bob H wasn't Patty. It's IMPOSSIBLE. The head alone (to point to just one thing) immediately rules him 100% out. You'd have to slice half of Bob H's forehead off to make him fit Patty's head....in which case Bob H would be long dead.
Yawn!
DeleteNot really a quote, but a skeptic over there posted the Blevins suit side by side with Patty and tweaked the contrast.
DeleteNow Blevins looks more like Patty than Patty did.
yea blevins proved that patty was well within human in a suit range
Deleteall that non human arm length is just nonsense
now just stick the same kinda fur on the suit and you got ya self the pgf suit
easy:)
Blevins made that suit for 240 bucks in his garage.
DeletePrincess Munns wants 10k and a workshop to soothe his ego.
U of Idaho should give their next grant to Blevins. They could save themselves $9760
Leroy might be loonier than tunes, but at least he's not a fraud.
There used to be a chick in my avatar. Now it's just me and I'm so lonely. I'll stick my neck on the block and declare that.
DeleteIf it's soooo easy to fake the patty suit, why hasn't someone done it and reproduced the PG film? It's so easy right, and inexpensive right? You can't fake being 600-800 lbs. Those patty footprints went deeper than the horses' did. They had the mid-tarsal break. Even you low budget underemployed dimwits could do it right?
DeleteCrickets......
DeleteI'm actually building one right now, Billy Boy. It's coming along nicely. Patterson didn't overthink everything. That's why there are holes in his story. It's not as difficult as bleevers bleeve.
DeleteSays who? We don't even know if the subject in the film left the footprints. It is a debatable issue. Proof that Patty did indeed leave the prints would be a major break through-issues like the ones you mention(depth, possible anatomical details) would be much more meaningful in authenticity arguments.
DeleteThere is a thread on the BFF where a poster by the name of Sweaty Yeti attempts to connect the prints to the subjects feet if you are interested.
At the end of the day only 2 people know for sure and one is dead and the other's sticking to the story true or not. Fuck it the argument's been going for what 45 years??
Delete^ Meant for 4:54....third!!
Delete^^ That right there, young feller.
DeleteNo one has to fake being 600-800 lbs, but I'm glad my bullshit made a lasting impression on y'all.
There's a connection between the creature and the tracks cause good ole Rog told you so. And y'all bought it hook line and sinker.
As for BobbyH saying I pounded plaster casts in the ground he was kinda right. 'Cept they was cement casts poured around wooden stakes, then hammered with a sledge.
Cement, plaster, how was Bobby to know the difference? He wasn't. He didn't need to know that.
I'm humbled about the attention and money y'all gave my family over the years, but I'll let you in on a bigfoot secret:
You city slickers is the types to treat a sick dog with a whole paycheck, where I treated my sick dogs with a rifle.
That's how come y'all ain't never been able to figger out how I dunn didit.
The PG footprint casts showed the mid-tarsal break well before anybody like Meldrum or Chilcut lent their opinions on the subject. If it was easy to move as gracefully as Patty did while being heavy enough to make those prints, surely you skeptics would have done it years ago right? The reason James Randi and/or his skeptic friends haven't done it and reproduced the whole scenario is because nobody CAN do it.
DeletePatty is the real deal. You skeptics just can't explain these facts. Regardless of the "suit", It's a matter of moving that fast with that much weight and that big of a stride. If it was easy to fake it would have been reproduced by now. I'm sure in your replies you won't address these points. You'll just say its fake, because you don't really have it figured out.
anon 4:22, Patty's legs are bare. You can see this by the shaking muscle mass and meat during the turn and slight stumble. The legs are bare, not encased in any suit. YOu can say hair was glued on, but not that the legs are covered by a suit.
DeleteObvious here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUXkq_HVgIc
One YT commentator noted rippling leg flesh, spinal erectors, etc., obviously not a costume.
Also arm length issue is not nonsense. Watch footage of Patty from behind, later in the film, note arms and spinal erectors. It's clear.
Ok Ripper... since there is no suit covering the legs of Patty, can you, in all your BF wisdom please tell us why her butt never moves or so much as a single twitch. the gluteal muscles on her are huge and yet they never move in any kind of flexing motion. Yeah.. Go back to BF/BF and see what they tell you about that...
DeleteWhat a bunch of baphoons!!!
Anyone taterhole who spouts off on a bigfoot board about spinal erectors and gluteal muscles doesn't know what spinal erectors and gluteal muscles are.
DeleteRipper's correct, check out stills of Patty later in the walk you clearly see how long her arms are. MK Davis proved butt movement too, go find it.
Deletebart has confirmed melba has the same sample that was verified as bear / justins dna by 2 different labs. It is this sample that ketchum sequenced the entire genome and claims its bigfoot.
ReplyDeletelol.
Sounds bout right :)
Deletewhere did she say she specificly tested his sample and that it was a bigfoot sequence so i may see this
DeleteShe didn't. Just another faggot troll posting Bullshit in between felch sessions.
DeleteShe also hasn't been able to publish anything showing test results of any samples yet so wouldn't get too excited anon 4:28
DeleteI'm not getting excited I know there's nothing out yet I was hoping he would tell me where his plethora of insider knowledge came from other then oh that's what I read here or my buddy said that happend
DeleteHuh?
DeleteBart doesn't know shit, he's not part of the solution but part of the problem like all of BFRO stringing gullible suckers along.
DeleteGo Melba, it's the only explanation. When is this hitting the public?
ReplyDeleteConfirms Melba on 2 points
ReplyDeleteConfirms she likes it in the taterhole
Confirms SHE is an IDIOT with ZERO cred
Confirms there is NO paper
Confirms this is ALL BS
YEP Melba is a HOAXER
^ Imitates local funny farm idol SnowWanker.
DeleteNew name for this blog: Bigfoot rumor and innuendo
ReplyDeleteThat's all Bigfoot can be till some one actually finds one, if they exist! You can't attack a blog on a creature not proven by science to exist for publishing rumours and innuendo that's all you can put out there! Every sighting is rumour and every unclear video or fuzzy photo is too and any opinion on Bigfoot is bound to be innuendo cos we haven't proved they are real! Dumbass
DeleteOh,Yeah? Well you're a ....a..... Dummy! that's what you are! You're so dumb, you're really dumb! Ha! Take THAT!
Deletethis is hilarious and cute if people would actually believe this, i don’t think anyone has to make another argument on this.
ReplyDeleteKaley Cuoco
?
Delete^^ hot blonde from 8 simple rules for dating my teenage daughter I prefer the red head but still vey cute
DeleteMaking what come together? We haven't seen anything yet!
ReplyDeleteSure we have.
DeleteThis so-called double-digit team of experts is so confident and proud of their continuing ground-breaking work but yet they are afraid of ridicule if they are named as being part of the project???
ReplyDeleteMelba is now realizing the big charade is in its final days and is trying to deflect some of the blame to a phantom crew.
Here have some more crow clueless dipshit.
DeleteShe probably did testing. But having the technical skills in a lab does not a scientist make. She probably got her results, but does not really know what to do with it. She is looking for scientists who know what it means, but does not have the DNA science to get anything moving. But how can a scientist work with her when they never have any control, and where the data was examined by someone not giving confidence that she is a credible science person? I think that is the problem she is having.
DeleteSo bigfoot is a bearman hybrid
ReplyDeleteYeah but totally different to the Dogmen
DeleteBigfoot's none of that.
DeleteShe's so brave
ReplyDeleteYou're so severely gay.
DeleteIts okay if you like that,I won't hold it against you,unless you want me to.
DeleteYour gayness would repel even the gayest of men. Including your Dad.
Deleteyour cruelty makes me love you more,let go of your hate
DeleteLet go of my balls, I'm about to ejaculate.
DeleteHate leads to fear, fear leads to the darkside
Deleteman,now whos gay?you really like it
DeleteI tied my sneakers today all by my self
ReplyDeleteLOL!! Show time soon! See you footers soon!
DeleteKaley Cuoco
My nut sack smells like kittens breath!
ReplyDeleteThat'll wash right off,you should feed your wife something besides catfood.
DeleteTranslation " My friend at Texas A+M who showed me how to submit a paper(subject codes, latex formatting etc) and the techs at the labs that did the actual work refuse to let me put their names on my oft rejected, pseudo-scientific, piece of shit paper."
ReplyDeleteTell him was he's won, Don...
DeleteThanks :)
DeleteMy Mommas brothers girlfriends cousin named me jim tomm and Mercy we saw one of them there sasquatches down by the still one night,
ReplyDeleteHuh?
ReplyDeleteTo all the doubters out there, nothing anyone can say will change your mind, if the paper is finished you will still run around finding an excuse not to believe. And by all means that's you r right, I not sure why you keep coming back for more. But I don't need any DNA results or any footers to convince me, because in 1975 in the pine thickets of Texas. I got all the proof I would ever need. And I tell you what I saw was a 7 to 8 foot creature about 450 lbs maybe.standing at the edge of a wood line, I did not smell anything no coned head, but I did see it at only 40 to 50 feet away, and as I looked at it scared wanting to run but simply unable to get my legs to move. he only stared at me and let out a low grawl, then it seemed to just turn and step disappearing into the woods. Many times in my life I have thought about what happen. And I don't claim to have the answers. But I can promise you one thing. Bigfoot is very real. For on a moonlit night at the age of 15 I got all the proof I will ever need.... Thanks. B.A.
ReplyDeleteI like your story, and I too have that proof. So, why do we care if they are proven?
DeleteHey, I feel the same way. On July 23rd, 2009 I had about a fifteen minute encounter with a large sasquatch. It was a crystal clear full moon night and I was on the front porch of my home. The area where I live has very high visibility at night when the moon is out and there is no cloud cover. You can literally drive a car w/o headlights if needed. My wife moved from Charleson WV into the country with me after marriage and she couldn't believe the visibility at night. (I live in a very rural, highly wooded area of WV with only tow neighbors for 1/4 mile) Anyway, while I was setting on my front porch I first heard very loud walking through the woods. Brush crashing, etc. I then saw what I thought was a huge person walking through the brush adjacent to my house. The "person" was watching me as it walked. The "person" then squatted down and continued watching me. (From about seventy feet away) I convinced myself I was looking at a very large beartrying to get up its nerve to knock over my trash cans. The bigfoot stayed in the squatted position for several minutes, just watching me while I watched it. (Remember, I had convinced myself that I was looking at a large bear. Finally, the large "bear" stood from the squatting position and it began walking on two legs again. This creature was atleast 7ft tall and very wide. It walked about 100 ft on around the hill and then commenced to "howl-scream" at me. I was in shock and disbelief. After another loud "howl-scream" another creature from across the valley howled back at it.
DeleteI freaked to say the least. The next few months we had numerous encounters including a clear daylight sighting. I have photographed an 18 inch track and a 13 inch track. We have had so many encounters that my family has simply accepted the fact that these creatures use our property in some way.
Prior to these events happening, I did not believe nor did I give any thought into bigfoot/sasquatch. Now I know. I was 39 years old when this happened to me. My family (children included) have all experienced different incidents over the past few years (chattering, rock throwing, howls, moans, etc.) A friend who recently came down to hunt our land heard the screams during one night. He and his wife could not believe their ears. My last undeniable incident occurred in mid November.
Archer1
This still has a few weeks to play out. Its all about One-upmanship. It will cause many to fall out with each other in the current bigfoot Community. This is why it is being done.
ReplyDeleteJohn Titor a time traveler from 2036
Lame.
DeleteI think what Melba called "peer review" was not really what she was doing. Maybe she was using the term loosely to mean, "I am looking for peers to review my testing." I think the wrote up some notes, and then went looking for scientists that would partner with her to interpret the science, and she can't get them.
ReplyDeletePeople assume that just because she can do a DNA test, that she also has the scientific DNA knowledge to interpret the results and compound it all into a hypothesis. She found someone that said it looked like maybe a hybrid, but I don't think anyone will help her. That's what I think. Conversations probably start with them being told about her testing, but she needs help with the results. She just can't get a partner. And if she is not honest about her testing being in a real peer review, and the person she is talking to finds out that she is using that term loosely, then I am sure that ends the conversation. I don't know this, but it really looks like this is the case.
I am willing to bet that this situation is like the neutrino that went faster than light. When the testing was done, it showed an anomaly that seemed to show a neutrino traveled faster than light. The result alone was not enough, all of the science around that result have to be carefully examined by scientists to confirm or deny what happened.
ReplyDeleteI bet the same thing is happening with Ketchum. She did a test, and has a DNA anomaly that she cannot explain, and for which she cannot find a scientist to help her explain. If she is sloppy in her work because she doesn't have the scientific procedures necessary to confirm how the test was done, she may never get a scientist to sign on. What academic is going to help interpret DNA testing results where they didn't have their own lab controls, and is not clear if the right procedures were used. Contamination?? Helloo.
Their won't be a paper because of that problem. Just me reading between the lines.
Im with you Melba!
ReplyDeleteMeldrum, not Sarmiento, is the PhD prof from Idaho St who has delusions of BigFoot. The 2 do collaborate and write papers together, but not on BF.
ReplyDeleteUseful position.
ReplyDeleteYou generally come up with the most useful content and of course Blogger:
Bigfoot Evidence is simply no exception to this rule
My web-site - fungus
My site :: best nail fungus
Hey!
ReplyDeleteI'm at work browsing your blog from my iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts!
my blog; fuel mileage
My web site - iphone mileage
Hiya!
ReplyDeleteI was thinking of adding a website link back to
your site since both of our web sites are centered around the same subject.
Would you prefer I link to you using your website address: http://www.
blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=2925104810508047182&postID=6921422270677062638 or website title:
Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence. Please let me know! Cheers
my web page ... top 100 apps
I've loaded your website in 4 totally different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most. Would you mind e-mailing me the company name of your hosting company? I will sign up through your affiliate link if you'd
ReplyDeletelike. Thanks!
Also visit my page: Shooting Games Free Download
Hi!
ReplyDeleteOn this piece you go through a few of the most important ideas!
!
Easy to browse & full of very helpful suggestions!
Thanks for posting Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence!
my web blog Desktop gadget
my website :: desktop gadget
First-class article on Blogger: Bigfoot Evidence.
ReplyDelete.
It is definitely among the most helpful that I�ve found in a very long time.
Feel free to visit my site ... How to Golf
my site :: how to golf
Woah! I'm really loving the template/theme of this website. It's simple, yet effective.
ReplyDeleteA lot of times it's difficult to get that "perfect balance" between user friendliness and visual appeal. I must say you have done a amazing job with this. In addition, the blog loads very quick for me on Opera.
Great Blog!
Here is my web blog ... Beginners Golf Putting