In this video, Phil breaks down the creepy gymnastics Bigfoot video we posted about yesterday. He gives some basic points to look for in a hoaxed video by using this example. Phil writes, "I think the guy went through a lot of trouble for this one." Watch below:
Arla is what you would call a habituator, someone with long term interactions with Bigfoot but does not want to take any pictures of them.
ReplyDeletePictures of bigfoot birthing stations is enough evidence for any reasonable scientist.
DeleteAnd should be studied more thoroughly for evidence of placenta residue.
DeleteBigfoots are known to eat their afterbirth to protect newborns from predators.
DeleteTrust me. I know.
I've been tracking sasquatches for 25 years
THERES SOMETHING ON THE HILL!!!
DeleteROAR!
DeleteThat makes perfect sense. It's great having expert researchers here, to explain exactly what is going on with these enigmatic creatures.
DeleteSasquathces do exist.
DeleteYes and they adhere to the squatchatorial laws of nature.
DeleteArla's birthing station is disgusting and filled with DNA.
Deletebigfoots are real regardless of filthy trolls
Deleteopinions vary, except when they're typed by the same person over and over and over. Then they'd be the same.
DeleteSHUT UP ! I was getting a response and you stepped on it. dam it BO BO !
DeleteTHE AFTERMATH OF THE "DAISY IS IN THE BOX" FIASCO
DeleteWhat has the Bigfoot community learned from the MABRC's total mismanagement of the "Daisy is in the box" allegations? What positive can emerge from their fiasco?
1. A new "No Body - No Press" policy is being implemented in most Bigfoot Facebook Groups, Bigfoot Websites, and Bigfoot Organizations. It's a very simple and effective policy to implement. In the future, if anyone alleges that they have a Bigfoot body (Dead or Alive), all of us simply require them to produce the body immediately or go away (i.e., "No Body - No Press"). We don't spend our time investigating "Rabbit Trail Issues", instead, we simply require them to produce a body or they don't get any more of our time or attention.
2. We learned that the Bigfoot community is clearly divided via the Researchers camp and the Habituators camp. Many Researchers clearly believe that the Bigfoot species is a descendant of Gigantopithicus (i.e., A dumb giant mountain ape) and could easily be captured in a box. Many Habituators clearly believe that the Bigfoot species are "Forest People" and that there's no way that they would ever be stupid enough to be caught in a box. Score one up on the chalkboard for the Habituators.
3. Bigfooters can be very forgiving when it's members make mistakes and apologize for the mess they created.
What else do you think the Bigfoot community has learned from the MABRC's mismanagement of the "Daisy is in the box" fiasco?
Dr Matthew A Johnson
(Owner of the "Team Squatchin USA" Facebook Group)
Habiuators are explorers in the further reaches of retardation, and so are you for suggesting otherwise.
DeleteSomeone has an overinflated sense of self importance.
DeleteFinally NUMBER ONE! Thank you Lord!!
ReplyDeleteFAIL!
DeleteYour number one in my book
Deletelook out for #1 but don't step in #2
DeleteBigfoot is an intergalactic time traveler.
ReplyDeleteNo bigfoot is aninterDIMENSIONAL time traveler. Dumbass
Deleteno space
DeleteNo time either.
DeleteI'm a traveler of both time and space, to be where I have been.
DeleteBigfoot is an alien rodent
DeleteHerpity Derpity! I is a space/time traveler too! I travels outward in space and forward in time! Har har har har har whore!
Delete-Tim Fasano
Bigfoot takes no prisoners.
ReplyDeleteThe elusive Gymfoot. I miss the cup of coffee with uncle Phil.
ReplyDeleteBigfoots don't often use their magic, but when they do, watch out.
DeleteTrolls don't often use their brains but when they do watch out.
Delete^^^^
DeleteDoesn't often use his dick since he lost his arms.
Bigfoot are rumored to train wild bears to do their bidding.
ReplyDeleteTrolls are rumored to train wild bears to do their typing
ReplyDeleteThat would actually be more difficult than typing, and would require knowing how to type. You're retarded.
DeleteThat's it Phil, skip over the strangely enormous buttocks, the shoulders and head, the right arm length apparent when the figure starts to run off. Nice going.
ReplyDeleteKeep skipping the evidence, way to go.
Skeptics, because they skip evidence, are skiptics.
Skip skip skip.
Apparently these days being skeptical means being skiptical:
Don't look at it; look away!
It's a guy in a furry leotard.
DeleteQuite frightening that anyone would think otherwise.
MMG
Apparently these days being a footer means making up words...and evidence.
DeleteI agree, bad breakdown. Its not very thorough and he assumes alot. Camera goes out of focus because it pans right and tree starts to enter the center of viewing field, these high end cameras do that, just the opposite of what stupid phil says. Take a closer look at feet phil and the body. Shawn stop posting idiotic breakdowns....
DeleteChanging the subject here. Has any one noticed the shroud of Turin, how rediculously long JC's right forearm is?
ReplyDeleteIt’s a red ochre painting. The artist could have painted the forearm however long he pleased. Case closed.
DeleteNews Flash For All of the Phil's Out There !!!!
ReplyDeleteMost modern video cameras have AUTO FOCUS. When the videographer either moves or pans sideways and a nearby tree appears in the lens, the camera attempts to refocus on the tree, all by itself. In this case, if an experienced person wanted to properly film the subject, he would have thought ahead of time and set the camera on Manual Focus and set the focus distance on infinity. The Manitoba video is famous for that video being autofocused on some brush that was only a few feet away, while the subject appeared to be in focus to the videographer, while viewing it through the view finder. Yet it came out horribly.
Therefore, no conspiracy to defocus on the above video.
You can see the cuff around the ankle. When you stop the video with it facing the camera you can see where the top and bottom of the suit meet at the waist, a straight line. Hell, you can even tell the "manhood" is covered by fabric even as the guy tries to hide it with his hand. Then look at the toes. Oh wait, there are no toes! Because he is wearing a suit.
ReplyDeleteCome on people, I want to see a real bigfoot as bad as some others but this surely is not one. Why would it behave that way? Did it eat some funny mushrooms or berries? It's a hoax.
Jimothy,
DeleteThere’s no need to have a spaz dude. Only like two people in all of footery are actually buying this bullshit video, and they’re the same super-tards who believe in “birthing stations”, “mind speak”, and “the Patterson-Gimlin film”. They’re also the same chronic failures who say “manhood” instead of penis.
I was attempting sarcasm but must be too tired to get it across correctly. There are a few who think this is real and I am only trying to get them to see it is a hoax, by me, a believer, pointing stuff out for them.
DeleteThe mind speak and birthing stations are too much for me, but the PGF is not. The "manhood" was another attempt at sarcasm and my trying to use better language. I was going to say "junk" or "dick" but thought manhood was funnier as only childish people do these stupid hoaxes.
Oh well, guess I failed, again.
Parnassus here. Come see me talk about Bigfoot and Heart stuff.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.tctconference.com/about-tct/faculty.html?task=search&frm_searchfrom=agenda&frm_search_terms=R.+Michael+Wyman&sessionid=1891
Reality here. Come see me talk sense and be reasonable and correct.
Deletehttp://www.youareafuckingfaggot/youcocksuckingdouche/goplayintraffic/yourmotherisawhore.com
Come at me bro!
Deleteobama is gunna get yer guns. hurry you hillbillies, buy all the assault weapons you can!
ReplyDeletePhil is awful
ReplyDeleteIt's pretty good compositing but the animation and modeling throw it off.
ReplyDeleteYou just had to breakdown the arm length.
ReplyDeleteThe only thing the hoaxer got close was the big feet.
Otherwise pathetic.