Monday, February 18, 2013

I Think Steven Streufert Is The Most Anti-Ketchum Guy In The Universe


Steven Streufert is a friend of BFE, and he does not mind us calling him anti-Dr. Melba Ketchum -- trust us. It's obvious by all the negative Bigfoot DNA related articles and critical questions about Ketchum's study posted in his Facebook group, "Coalition for Reason, Science, Sanity in Bigfoot Research", that he's not too fond of Ketchum.

What really bugs him the most is the fact that he can't find anything on record about the science journal,  "Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology", Ketchum supposedly purchased before renaming it to DeNovo. "No prior papers. No authors. No editors. No peer reviewers. FAKE," Streufert complained on Facebook:

Can anyone out there find any information on the record and credentials of the "Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology," which Melba Ketchum supposedly bought and which supposedly did "peer review" on her paper? It is entirely gone, so far as I can tell (dead link), and not turning up anywhere in Google save in being mentioned in Bigfoot DNA-related articles. I suspect this "Journal" was a big nothing that never published much of anything, if anything at all. IS KETCHUM LYING TO US???

Another problem he has with Ketchum is that she chose a less than professional website creation tool to create the DeNovo Science Journal website. He found several mistakes on their page, including a spelling error. "They can't even spell their own name: '©DeVono Scientific Publishing,'" he wrote:

CREATE YOUR OWN JOURNAL, YOUR OWN WEB SITE, BE YOUR OWN PEER REVIEW BOARD, BE YOUR OWN EDITOR, DO SCIENCE *YOUR* WAY, WITHOUT ALL OF THAT NASTY NEED FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND CREDIBILITY. IT'S EASY!

Here is the site that was used to create DeNovo Journal by Ketchum. VERY PROFESSIONAL. Just cliick "view source" on the DeNovo page and you will see the link-backs to this site creator.
http://www.wix.com/
Posted by Shawn at 2/18/2013 03:18:00 PM

233 comments:

  1. Ketchum does not care what Steven bookseller says!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. you'll pay your $30 and you'll like it.

      Delete

    2. WILL SOMEBODY THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!!!!!

      Delete

    3. Let me get this straight you want the warped twisted people that come here to think about children???? Are you mad?!

      Delete

    5. All I can think is how deranged Ketchum and her followers must be.

      Delete

    6. This is a top 5 biggest hoax in Bigfoot history, potentially moving into the top 3:

      PG Film
      Ketchum Study
      BFRO and Finding Bigfoot
      Dyer Body
      Minnesota Iceman

      All fake.

      Delete

    7. ^ Suffering from severest form of denial.

      Delete

    8. I agree! Screw Steven!
      Bitch complain ! Bitch complain !
      Put a sick in it Steven !!!

      Delete

    9. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

    10. That's what your into Steven? Reading comments left by trolls? You always respond to trolls, why?
      Grow up Steven!! Your a joke!!

      Delete

    11. Steven has an average IQ if that....
      You think it's fun to argue with trolls!
      You will never see or read comments from anyone who is REAL in the Bigfoot community!

      Go Away Steven, don't respond to Trolls, it's not a game

      Delete

    12. Wow, good point! Anybody with any substance will never respond or post like Steven dose!
      Your right about that.

      Delete

    13. Steven is gayer than Richard Simmons, he makes Richard look as if he dose not even try to be gay!

      Delete

    14. One idiot troll does not make it true.

      Ha ha, and why not? It gave me the chance to post some actual reasonable views on these matters, including this very insightful article:

      Melba Ketchum’s Bigfoot DNA Study: The Questionable Ethics Of
      Creating A Journal to Bypass Peer-Review

      http://www.historum.com/blogs/ghostexorcist/1380-melba-ketchum-s-bigfoot-dna-study-questionable-ethics-creating-journal.html

      Delete

    15. It is indeed funny to me. And Shawn will delete or ban the worst offenders at my request, which makes calling out you trolls even more useful.

      Delete

  2. Steven Steufert is the Steve Bushemi we never had.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Buscemi wishes. I like Stroodie. He comes off as a little goofy but I bet he's a solid fella.

      Delete

  3. Apparently he lacks Google search skills...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Provide a link, then, anony.
      The original Scholastica link is dead:

      https://scholasticahq.com/journal-of-advanced-multidisciplinary-exploration-in-zoology/publication_stream

      Delete

    2. AND this "journal" left no publication citations.

      Delete

  4. Steven is correct, Melba is a fraud and we will be going after her in a court of law, fraud and defrauding others is a serious crime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Let's see how that works out for you. You would be looking at potentially years, even if you have a case.

      Delete

    2. Kind of like her stringing out her Peer Review.

      Delete

    3. Hmmmm...should I believe another random nobody in the BF Community that turns out to be a guy that runs a bookstore and has delusions of grandeur ? Or a the person who has years of forensic DNA analysis experience and has been asked by District Attorneys to be an expert witness on DNA evidence?

      Hint: it's not the guy that is about to be put out of business by Amazon.

      Delete

    4. Melba and the others should be taking streufert and you( anon 3:29) to court for defamation you moron! Streufert and you attack someone's character with lies and guesses and You talk about taking Melba to court? Your case would fall apart so quick it would make your head spin! Good luck on your court case you loud mouth lying Moron!

      Delete

    5. YA! What anon 6:07 said!!

      Delete

    6. What case was she asked to be an expert witness on? I remember talking to another anon last Nov/Dec and he'd search through court records and couldn't find her listed as a witness in any criminal case. I thought her job was mainly to do with pedigree animals like horses, dogs and cats varifing pedigrees and stuff? Isn't the complaints from her work in that field responsible for the bad ratings from the BBB?

      Delete

    7. She works on DNA not just a vet. There is a story behind the BBB rating and to get it go back and listen to here coast to coast interview late last year.

      Delete

    8. Yeah she tests animals DNA to varify that their pedigrees are correct. Didn't she list member of some pedigree cat and dog society on her list of credentials last year, I think she did? What forensic cases has she been called as a witness on?

      Delete

    9. Please provide us with a certified copy of the receipt for the money that you never paid to Ketchum, on the project that you never hired her for. Then, please prove that you have suffered financial loss as a proximate cause of Ketchum performing the work that you never hired her to provide. Every legitimate attorney will bodily throw you out of their office.

      Delete

    10. What are you babbling about?

      Delete

    11. What he's talking about is the moron anon 3:29 who claims That she is defrauding others! She isn't defrauding s*it! Name one cent out of anyone's pocket? Defraud this Mutha F*cker!

      Delete

    12. BE, SS, TT, BFRO - some of the biggest bigfoot liars and hoaxers in the world.

      Delete

    13. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

    14. Your a joke for even responding Steven

      Delete

    15. Grow up dude! Steven your a clown!
      Look it's the clown Steven and he has some complaining to do!
      Your a joke!

      Delete

    16. Ha ha, and why not? It gave me the chance to post some actual reasonable views on these matters, including this very insightful article:

      Melba Ketchum’s Bigfoot DNA Study: The Questionable Ethics Of
      Creating A Journal to Bypass Peer-Review

      http://www.historum.com/blogs/ghostexorcist/1380-melba-ketchum-s-bigfoot-dna-study-questionable-ethics-creating-journal.html

      Delete

  5. no need to get stressed out about it all

    bigfoot dont exist its all a bit of fun

    sit back with a beer and enjoy the comedy

    melba, smeja, dyer, meldrum etc all great characters to be entertained by.

    if you get bored just check out mulders posts on the bff they will have you in tears

    great stuff keep up the good work everyone in footery land :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. who is this mulder person? Is it really worth checking out?

      Delete

    2. yes make sure you are sitting down.

      Delete

    3. Does he take the name after the X-Files character?

      Delete

    4. well, I went there and scrolled a couple posts, didn't see his name pop up, Give me a topic this "mulder" person has commented on so I can check it out.

      Delete

    5. hes being laying low since the ketchum paper has been released because he is one of the biggest supporters and I guess hes got egg on his face

      Delete

    6. Mulder's a rabid little weasel who thinks he was near a bigfoot in the woods once. Personally I thind the bf touched him in his naughty place, but that's up for conjecture.

      Mulder demands objectivity and critcal thinking from his opponents. He returns their courtesy with ad hom attacks and pissing in the wind.

      Mulder has a unique take on science. Science is a useless machine for Mulder, if science doubts bigfoot. There are about five scientists who acknowledge bf. Mulder says they are the only five scientists in the world who are performing their job correctly.

      Mulder used to have a buddy named Kerchak who would give mulder high fives and reacharounds with every post. Kerchak is now inactive.

      Mulder spent the last 5 years declaring Ketchum's paper a success, before it was even published.

      Mulder's world just got a little smaller in the last few days. Poor Muldy.

      Delete

    7. Well, he sounds like quite the character. Thanks for the laughs, I'll head over there and check it out...

      Delete

    8. So Mulder is also DWA? Because that one is a jerk as well.

      Delete

    9. Nobody in science reviewing the DNA study give a shit about this bat shit crazy blog's anti bf repeat offending terror, n o b o d y.

      Delete

  6. After this, let's talk about her glamour shot again, and after that let's mention "angel DNA" once more, and then about asking Smeja to temper with the sample, and then again about the journal, the misspellings, the design, the glamour shot, and not forget the BBB rating and the glamour shot... it's a rollercoaster, and who will even notice top independent PhDs confirming her conclusions - conclusions about what, again?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Yeah, Steven was sure pounding the crap out of the angel thing. Of course in the name of "satire", he'll put up the "melba toast" pictures and various other crap.

      Delete

    2. lol too funny, I love this blog

      Delete

    3. Great comment. Nothing original coming out of this place...same old stuff. Yawn

      Delete

    4. No kidding, makes me sick, I'm going back to BFF, people there at least know what they are talking about!

      Delete

    5. Stop it! You're killing me!

      Delete

    6. Yup, they know what they're talking about lol.

      Go read the habituator's thread.

      Sasfooty is either a liar or she should be seeking psychiatric help.

      This site, however, approaches bigfoot the way I approach the BFF: with a sense of humor and a little bit of bullshit.

      Don't forget to leave the bff admins some blueberries in their gifting baskets.

      Delete

    7. Never been there before but I have to admit the two posters who work in genetics were interesting.

      Delete

    8. Yes, Theagenes has been holding court quite beautifully over there.

      It will be interested to see if he grows tired of the forum before the forum grows tired of his sound reasoning.

      The other genetecist over there actually works in a video store.

      Delete

    9. Agreed. They shredded her paper like a bigfoot shreds poopy diapers out of the garbage.

      Delete

    10. Well, I'm back from that BFF place....are those people for real?
      I was there about 20 minutes,
      I honestly don't know what to think. Some of the comments are truly mind-boggling!

      Delete

    11. How's this for mind boggling? There's a woman there who pees against her fence and back door to keep the squatches away.

      Delete

    12. are you frickin kidding me!!???

      That is one of the wackiest things I've ever heard in bigfootery!

      I will never forget reading that now, thanks LOL

      Delete

    13. You mean keep Leon away?

      Delete

    14. Yeah, her hubby marks his territory too. What a piss party that household must be. They both have the same delusions and both see bigfoot.

      Must be something in their well water, or in their tobacco :)

      Delete

    16. man o man, imagine the things they do that are NOT posted on BFF then?
      Some people truly are too far gone I guess.

      I mean, peeing on your own property just to mark territory? That is something animals do! I thought they said bigfoot is a "being" similar to human, but it marks it's territory like an animal?

      Delete

    17. The pissin' woman thing is true, I've read it. That's nothing, compared to some of the crazy shit on BFF. When you're there, it's like you're in some alternate universe.

      Delete

    18. I doubt that anyone with just a casual interest in bigfoot would be aware of that stuff.
      No wonder people think footers are nutbars, if people behave in ways such as that!
      I'll spend some quality time on that forum tomorrow for sure. It sounds like great entertainment.
      I still can't stop laughing about it.

      Delete

    19. I can remember a story I heard somewhere about a woman witnessing a bigfoot having sex/and/or molesting her horse.
      It might have been on a blogtalkradio show, not sure though. That was also a classic story. Damn, I can't remember where I heard that one...apparently she said that she told the bigfoot to "get outta here" or something similar.
      These stories are fantastic fun!

      Delete

    20. If you really want to understand the bigfoot/blueberry connection you have to read the Habituation thread.

      Delete

    21. I've come late to the party but I too have been reading the posts over at the BFF for about a month or two and even though you can find crazy posts on almost every thread the habituator's posts are the knee-slappers. The best part though is coming over here and reading the posts about that site - priceless!

      Delete

    22. Somebody needs to punch that bug-eyed frog SS in the ass, he's getting on my tits.

      Delete

    23. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

    24. Why would you respond like this Steven?
      You are like little child!!
      Are you having fun Steven?

      Delete

    25. It is indeed funny to me. And Shawn will delete or ban the worst offenders at my request, which makes calling out you trolls even more useful.

      Delete

  7. SOME QUESTIONS FOR MELBA KETCHUM THAT SHOULD BE ASKED IN THE INTERVIEW TONIGHT ON COAST-TO-COAST AM. (Submitted by someone who wishes to remain anonymous.)

    1. Dr. Ketchum's excuse for not uploading the data to GenBank has been disputed by a scientist at Princeton. How does George know her "documentation" is valid? Is it something that could have been faked? Can he actually SPEAK to someone at GenBank to get a confirmation directly from them and NOT filtered through her?

    2. Can he SPEAK with the editor of the "journal" where her paper passed peer review for direct confirmation of her story, including the sequence of events?

    3. What is the name of the original journal?

    4. Can this editor confirm the purchase of the journal?

    5. How did Melba fund the purchase of this journal?

    6. What scientific society owned it previously and how/why did they agree to the sale?

    7. How much did acquisition of the journal cost?

    8. What happened to the journal's staff and editor? Did they lose their jobs? If not, why are they not listed on the website?

    9. Why didn't the purchase of the journal include its original website? Why throw together such a cheap-looking one with none of the standard information you see on other journal pages?

    10. Why didn't she keep the original journal's name and publication record?

    11. Why are there no citations for this journal?

    12. Why is there no evidence of this journal ever existing before?

    13. Who are these "top" geneticists who have come forward to review the paper?

    14. Why must they be anonymous?

    15. When they have their findings, will this be made public with their NAMES and professional credentials/affiliations provided? Or will this information also be filtered through her while they remain "anonymous?"

    16. Why have two of her coauthors said that they never even saw the paper (as reported on JREF).

    17. Why are her coauthors silent? Why have the coauthors not spoken up about their roles in the paper, or to defend its findings?

    18. If GenBank's refusal of her data is legitimate, will she freely share this data with other researchers in an open-source manner?

    19. Will she provide her data to Sykes? Immediately?

    ******

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. http://thebigfootnews.blogspot.com/

      Delete

    2. 20. If it's true that she has been blackballed by the rest of the science journals why not name and shame these journals and individuals to back up her story and give us names so we can fact check?
      21. Why didn't the raw data get published as part of the study so other geneticists could verify her results or conclusions?
      22. Will all the raw data and rejection emails or letters be published at some point?
      23. There have been several papers published in Nature journal that also present new species of homin ( homo rudolfensis and homo floresiensis ) and also other journals like PLos ONE which had a paper on the Red Deer People remains found in China and Science magazine which also had a study on Australopithecus sediba. All these discoveries challenge the percieved view of human evolution and all were published with no problems why would no one touch your paper?

      Delete

    3. possibly because the study suggests that they are among us in the here and now, not an extinct relative as you have listed.

      This paper suggests that bigfoot are in our backyard!

      Well, they are in mine, I don't know about you, but they are running rampant here where I live.

      Delete

    4. Are you the dude with the trailer having all the trouble? Dying to know what the expert recommended.

      Delete

    5. Then wouldn't this be even more of a reason to publish and if Ketchum has (as she says) all this DNA evidence (remember DNA doesn't lie) to back it up that's more evidence than there is for some of the extinct human species I mentioned. One of the editors of Nature magazine even suggested that today's Orang Pendek sightings could be homo floresiensis so they're obviously open minded. This whole it's Bigfoot so they all laughed at me is great to hide behind and also saying exactly what all the conspiracy theorists and people who have been ridiculed for their beliefs think would happen. It's telling people what they want to hear, that science mocks Bigfoot and wants to protect the traditional view of human evolution when infact people are publishing papers that challenge the old view of evolution all the time. If she did get mocked and refused publication was it maybe the study not the Sasquatch that caused it? Maybe it's bad science?

      Delete


    6. Now then were have I seen this before..........oh I know it was posted yesterday as an article on this very blog : http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/questions-for-dr-melba-ketchum-on-coast.html#moretop

      It would be great if we could have it posted again tomorrow just for any newcomers.

      Delete

    7. You heard her yourself, mainstream science is afraid of the truth because it's not the Darwinism they've been taught. They're either dumber than shit, which gievne their long educations is unlikely, or they're part of the status quo cover-up and the latter seems to be the case sadly. Otherwise there'd be no resistance to this only interest, but the dark froces are all over anything that threatens to disrupt the norm. This is what happens to any scientist stepping outside the bubbled-up box.

      Delete

  8. Does anyone really care about Steufarts opinion on, well, anything?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I know to never ask him to give a concise answer, that is for sure. That guy will give you several paragraphs on the weather.

      Delete

    2. I don't care for Streufort period! Who cares what he thinks the pompous ###@

      Delete

    3. There are some good threads over at the jref forums where he gets schooled and put in his place. It's great reading.

      Delete

    4. And who gives a shite what Pompous Anonymous says?

      Delete

    5. Streufert, u claim to have a bigfoot come in ur yard & lose his balance YET u claim ur a sceptic! Hmmm somethings FISHY here, U can't play both sides dude!!!

      Delete

    6. Streufert is Destroying the Bigfoot world ! Did he say he is a Shite? Sunni?

      Delete

    7. Skepticism is a method of approaching evidence and claims about reality, and ascertaining what is real and true. It does not mean "disbelief" or "denial."

      I am skeptical about everything because I am curious about reality. I want to know what is real. The years now spent dealing with the Ketchum Study have given me ample reason to be very skeptical indeed.

      Also, I do not claim that I know that was a Bigfoot in my yard. I describe what I heard and experienced. I did not actually see it. It was definitely something living, a big animal moving through the forest around my cabin. I say it *could* have been a Bigfoot, especially as it is difficult to imagine what else it could have been. It certainly did not sound and move like a bear or a deer.

      Delete

    8. Yet, u DON'T believe in them... Hhmmm..

      Delete

    9. I never said that, either.

      Belief is irrelevant to reality.

      Delete

    10. You're a slimy douche now fuck off you lying sack of crap.

      Delete

    11. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

    12. Steven I must say it makes me laugh out loud when you try to write something that sounds intelligent!
      I bet you take you time with your posts don't you!
      Hahaha

      Delete

    13. It takes mere seconds, actually.

      It is indeed funny to me. And Shawn will delete or ban the worst offenders at my request, which makes calling out you trolls even more useful.

      Delete

  9. Great job Steven! I knew this DNA paper is sketchy!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. stfu jay wtf do u know obv ud agree with your life partner steven.

      Delete

    2. Darn, now you know the truth. Curses..

      Delete

    3. ha ha ha! Who would have thought Meldrum was like this?
      The bigfoot world is full of surprises

      Delete

    4. Do you think I'm Meldrum? Meldrum is a great and professional man, he would never criticize anyone.

      Delete

    5. He is also a flaming homosexual that often shows up for expeditions dressed as Marie Antoinette.

      Delete

    6. Show us your dermal ridge!

      Delete

    7. I've heard Meldrum gets greats responses when Squatching in drag.

      I wonder what about it gets those Bigfeet going? Im guessing its the moustache.

      Delete


    8. I don't make a move until I have heard what Mr Steufarts has to say if people ask me what I think I just say ask Steven.

      Delete

    10. Jay for fuck's sake you're just a gullible kid who worships Meldrum, you're basically lost like so many others with an interest in this now Dr. Ketchum crushed your little Giganto dream that seemed idiotic anyway.

      Delete

  10. It's seems Nadia Moore over at the Team Tazer facebook page is the number two hater behind Steven. I saw her posting on Meldrum's facebook also. I don't know what her actual occupation is, but she sure is acting like a know it all (other people were commenting about that). She was also bashing the credentials of the PhD that came out and supported Ketchum.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. You didnt hear? Nadia got a bio degree at some ghetto community college, this braud knows her shit!! LOOOOOOOL

      Delete

    2. She's a biologist i think and regularly writes articles for this blog

      Delete

    3. Well, Michael Merchant is a herpetologist according to Animal Planet, but that is open to interpretation.

      Delete

    4. Can you say lacking? Or is it lacky? Hey Shawn if we can't swear why can the aligator? I just have so many questions. I'm so confused.

      Delete

    6. I'm a cryptolinguist. No I dont know what that even means either. Just give me your money.

      Delete

    7. Who's to say Merchant isn't a herpetologist ?

      Delete

    8. It's a title that has no certain qualifications, so it's open to interpretation.

      Delete

    9. Remember when you first entered the world of Footery? It was full of experts and men of science. Then you find out how ridiculous the whole thing is and they're all covered with warts.

      Delete

    10. Take Steve Kulls- my understanding is his background is in retail theft management (Wal-Mart I believe) and not so much private investigation. Paulides also stretches his law enforcement background and was actually fired from his job.

      Delete

    11. Here is a Nadia Moore quote about reading the Ketchum paper,

      " I have not given up, just have more important things on my plate right now than wasting my time on a con artist with no real scientific understanding beyond running her store bought analysis kits."

      Whatever you may think of Ketchum, I think that is a damn arrogant statement.

      Delete

    12. Paulides is the biggest joke in this field next to Ketchum and Joe Black.

      Delete

    13. I think Nadia seems to be saying the same as the rest of us! This is a long con going down here to get cash outta Wally, then get a little more out of the footers and what's this start a foundation in your own name? Wow

      Delete

    14. It's like a baseball team where all three batters strike out evey single inning.

      Delete

    16. The world has its Bernie Madoffs who aim high but there's also its Melbas, Smejas and Freezer Boys who settle for the lower tier of gullibles.

      Delete

    17. For some reason a lot of gullible geeks thought and wanted this to be an ape snap out of it already you losers.

      Delete

  11. The picture on this post contains the "S" word. What about the children? Do we not care about the children anymore?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Nope we don't Bigfoot is gonna eat them anyway what's the point in gifting baskets then?

      Delete

    2. Shawn took the high road for about a day and a half then it was back to business as usual.

      Delete

  12. Didn't look to hard did they

    Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in ... - ZooBank.org


    zoobank.org/.../B1623D76-00C9-4189-A991-B5AC652B4763


    Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Exploration in Zoology. LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B1623D76-00C9-4189-A991-B5AC652B4763 ...








    JAMEZ 2013 : Journal of Advanced Zoological Exploration in Zoology


    97.107.135.119/cfp/servlet/event.showcfp?eventid=28039...


    Jan 11, 2013 – Bookmark and Share. Link: https://scholasticahq.com/journal-of-advanced-multidisciplinary-exploration-in-zoology/about ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    2. Yes, there is a Journal NAME listed; alas, there are NO PAPERS listed as being published in the Journal. Try Google Scholar; enter the journal name. Nothing. No prior papers. No record of anything being publish in it at all.

      Delete

  13. Steven Stroidel is a troll. Period. He makes Bobbie Kean look like a Disney Princess.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Unfortunately, that's the way he really rolls.

      Delete

    2. Anonymous Troll Monday, February 18, 2013 at 4:23:00 PM PST Proves that they are a Troll by trolling Steven. How pathetic and sad.

      Delete

    3. It's not at all hard @5:17. He throws a hissy fit about it quite often. Then he will go into a long winded explanation of why is getting out of bigfoot. It happens all the time.

      Delete

    4. Being a critical thinker does not make one a troll. Skepticism is a virtue, especially in the face of unreasonable, unfounded or idiotic claims.

      Delete

    5. You're not a critical think you dumb shit if you were you'd know this study's for real and found the real thing, it may not sit well with your old ideas of what it's supposed to be according to Hollywood and certain traditional foot searchers - guess what, you were all wrong. So as I see it you have two choices, you either join the truth here now or leave the field behind and in your case may I suggest you try the latter as unfit to handle news as you appear.

      Delete

    6. Stevie says: "unreasonable, unfounded or idiotic claims." Explain please what the hell you mean. If you refer to the DNA study it's all in the paper even if it doesn't match your naive hopes of some wild beast on the loose, DNA doesn't lie. Crow time, Stevie.

      Delete

    7. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

  14. Paulides want to give Melba a DEEP rimming of the taterhole.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. I thuoght they were drinking Margaritas. That explains all of the talk about licking the rim.

      Delete

    2. Why does Ketchum utilize at least a 40 year old picture of herself? WTF is that all about anyway?

      Delete

  15. MULDER!!!

    STOP POSTING OVER HERE ABOUT KETCHUMS FAKE JOURNAL.

    GO BACK TO THE BFF AND TAKE YOUR BEATINGS LIKE A MAN!

    ReplyDelete

  16. anyone know where I can buy the book "50 years with bigfoot" by Janice Carter?

    I am seriously interested in reading this. Can't find it anywhere!

    These habituation books are extremely interesting and fascinating to me. Chris Noel's book is great, can't wait to buy his new one.

    Anyway's
    anybody know anything about purchasing Janice Carter's book?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. You know they're fiction, right?

      Delete

    2. I suspect that they are genuine.

      They certainly read like legitimate books to me.

      Habituation is an important step in this ongoing scientific discovery.

      Delete

  17. I hate BFE for making me curious enough to click on Steven's facebook page.

    His FB page is 100 times worse than BFE when it comes to mud slinging. All his posts were flaming posts about Melba with him trying to dig up more dirt on her.

    I guess I was assuming w/ a name like "Coalition for Science and Sanity" would have posts about actual facts that support the idea of Bigfoot's existence. Boy was I completely way off base there.

    He should change his groups name from "Coalition for Reason, Science, Sanity in Bigfoot Research" to "Coalition for Sociopathic Tabloid Untrue Research"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. He needs to get attention from somewhere/something right?
      That bookstore probably gets lonely sometimes....

      Delete

    2. I'd say that is pretty good analysis @6:01. The amount of people that post there has decreased steadily. His fights with women in particular are telling.

      Delete

    3. Sorry if speaking the truth offends your pet beliefs.

      Delete

    4. I guess if in pet beliefs you mean my perception or assumption that any member of the BF community would be soley focused on the goal of proving the existence of bigfoot and not on smear campaigns. And the sad truth being the actual opposite ... then yes it offends my pet belief. Or rather offended as in past tense because you've shown that altruistic belief was false.

      But if I ever decide to run for office. I'll know who to call.

      Delete

    5. It should not be a matter of "proving a belief to be real." It should be a discovery of what is real and what is not, and the ability to tell the difference. Even if Bigfoot is real, it has to be admitted that most of the claimed evidence and claims about it are going to be exaggerated products of confirmation bias, wishful thinking, and perhaps outright false or hoaxed. That is just the nature of this pursuit.

      Delete

    6. What kind of truth are you speaking about, Stew? What have you proven other than your own sad jealousy? You're just about the biggest loser in this field, at least SnowPoop is funny you're just pathetic. The study IS real and the results ARE real, so what wishful thinking are you talking about? You're incredibly dumb aren't you, you're making up shit as you go along.

      Delete

    7. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

    8. Hahaha, wow! Hey dose anyone notice that this Steven writes like a angry gay guy that try's to fool common folk into believing he is intelligent?
      Give it up

      Delete

    9. Homophobic troll, proving gayness of himself. Whatever.

      Delete

  18. Strueferts site is Tabloid Garbage!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. He even gives white trash a bad name, it's as low as it gets.

      Delete

    2. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

  19. try faze-jamez.org a name that comes up with the acronym search for jamez
    also, on the whois domain it shows this domain changing on jan 10 2013
    they look connected because the website of faze-jamez domain is also wix and the email is private through a third party service



    Domain ID:D167544261-LROR
    Domain Name:FAZE-JAMEZ.ORG
    Created On:09-Jan-2013 07:29:45 UTC
    Last Updated On:09-Jan-2013 07:29:51 UTC
    Expiration Date:09-Jan-2014 07:29:45 UTC
    Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions, LLC (R63-LROR)
    Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
    Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
    Registrant ID:53297483-NSIV
    Registrant Name:FAZE
    Registrant Organization:FAZE
    Registrant Street1:ATTN insert domain name here
    Registrant Street2:care of Network Solutions
    Registrant Street3:PO Box 459
    Registrant City:Drums
    Registrant State/Province:PA
    Registrant Postal Code:18222
    Registrant Country:US
    Registrant Phone:+1.5707088780
    Registrant Phone Ext.:
    Registrant FAX:
    Registrant FAX Ext.:
    Registrant Email:
    Admin ID:53297483-NSIV
    Admin Name:FAZE
    Admin Organization:FAZE
    Admin Street1:ATTN insert domain name here
    Admin Street2:care of Network Solutions
    Admin Street3:PO Box 459
    Admin City:Drums
    Admin State/Province:PA
    Admin Postal Code:18222
    Admin Country:US
    Admin Phone:+1.5707088780
    Admin Phone Ext.:
    Admin FAX:
    Admin FAX Ext.:
    Admin Email:
    Tech ID:53297483-NSIV
    Tech Name:FAZE
    Tech Organization:FAZE
    Tech Street1:ATTN insert domain name here
    Tech Street2:care of Network Solutions
    Tech Street3:PO Box 459
    Tech City:Drums
    Tech State/Province:PA
    Tech Postal Code:18222
    Tech Country:US
    Tech Phone:+1.5707088780
    Tech Phone Ext.:
    Tech FAX:
    Tech FAX Ext.:
    Tech Email:

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. call the tech phone number Steven.

      Delete

  20. http://www.dailychanges.com/wix.com/2013-01-10/

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. http://whois.domaintools.com/faze-jamez.org

      Delete

    2. holy crap batman
      check the dates
      peer review takes so long
      BS

      Delete

  21. Shawn is making some money milking you skeptics for hits with rubbish articles by clowns like this guy. You are to busy thinking Ketchum is trying to pull the wool over your eyes to realise the real guy making the money from this circus is Shawn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. And as good as anyone to do so. Living the dream really. Did you pay Melba?

      Delete

    2. I'd rather earn money for Shawn making absurd comments than fork over twenty bucks to the bff for a preem membership.

      Delete

    3. Will he also be making a contribution to the Melba Ketchum Foundation to help protect these wonderful creatures?! Yeah I'm sure Shawn is buying a mansion as we speak with all this money just pouring in! I heard he got a new Porsche yesterday! Seriously do you idiots actually think this is true? Do your feeble minds have any control over your fingers and what you type??

      Delete

    4. No, But my thinking is I wouldn't fully understand it so I'm waiting for someone with a background in genetics to do so and either verify or say her findings are BS. But I'm not going to discount her findings out of hand without all the facts. That would be stupid in my opinion. But there's a lot of things and comments on this site which are nonsensical so maybe its not the right place to discuss this subject like seriously.

      Delete

    5. i hope he is making enough to make his time worth it. stop worrying and simmer down.

      Delete

    6. Just proves what a hypocritical bunch of losers these skeptards are, in their futile attempts to cover up they claim bigfooting is all about money yet here they are shoveling cash for Shawnie.

      Delete

  22. Half you redneck fools wouldn't be able to read or interpret a scientific journal if it was free. Have any of you dribblers even read it yet or are you guys just assuming its BS.

    Has any body with a proper educated scientific background come out and explained how its BS? If so could you link me to it.

    At least she has put her findings out there to be looked at and discussed !!! Which No one here seems to want to do. Instead of just saying its horse shit without reading it and discussing it, why not wait till someone who knows what they are talking about has a look at it. And then decide !!!

    Although I do agree with the above comment that only one person is making money off you skeptics, and that's shawn. Every retarded comment on here is making him money, I bet he loves seeing the "first" roll in on every stupid article !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    2. Yes of course we are making Shawn a millionaire ! I bet with all this money he'll donate a large sum to Melba Ketchum's Foundation kinda sponser a Sasquatch! You could call him Fox Jnr! You know you are partially correct about proving Ketchum's report to be garbage is hard purely because she's intentionally not put it on GenBank or released the raw data with the study, wonder why that is?

      Delete

    3. What Raw data has she not released? What's the process for putting it in the Genbank?

      Delete

    4. There's nothing to look at yet. No sequences, no Genbank, no data. Until that's fixed... might as well not have published it unless they're absolutely desperate for their $30.

      Delete

  23. The Steven Streufert sleeper cell has now been activated.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. That just means his cellphone is on silent mode.

      Delete

    3. Funniest comment on here in weeks! Well done anon!

      Delete

  24. does anyone here bother with the BFE forum? Is it crazy like the BFF?
    I would prefer an anony opinion prior to checking it out ....please?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. They're about the same crazy as BFF, same stupid too.

      Delete

    2. well, is there any sane forum at all then?

      lol, I know it's bigfoot to begin with, but still...

      Delete

    3. Leave here for starters, we know you won't of course because it's become your life.

      Delete

    4. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

      Delete

    5. Hey everyone look who it is!!
      The Bitch of Bigfootinng!!
      Complain complain complain -
      -screw you bud!

      Delete

  25. Tired of little gay Steven, screw him he knows nothing!
    He is in the way and starting to piss people off!
    Worthless little tiny wannabe man with a big mouth!
    KEEP IT UP LITTLE MAN

    ReplyDelete

  26. I NOTICE THE KETCHUMITE TROLLS HAVE ARRIVED. What fun!!!

    Same dude, same stupid statement. One anonymous guy with two dozen idiotic comments.

    Yelling about it doesn't make the Ketchum study true, man. Sorry, but scientific proof takes more than screaming and blind belief.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. Yeah you know everything don't you!
      Your so smart! Hey everyone, look how Smart Steven is with his BIG WORDS!
      I be you have a Franklin Spelling Ace huh Steven! Why don't you go crawl back into the hole you came from!

      Delete

    2. Big words? Those are just NORMAL words, common in the intelligent use of the English language. Sorry your feel so insecure.

      Delete

  27. Melba Ketchum’s Bigfoot DNA Study: The Questionable Ethics Of
    Creating A Journal to Bypass Peer-Review

    http://www.historum.com/blogs/ghostexorcist/1380-melba-ketchum-s-bigfoot-dna-study-questionable-ethics-creating-journal.html

    ReplyDelete

  28. Many Journals get scrutinized! This is very common, you do know this? Right?

    ReplyDelete

  29. What makes you such a authority on Scientific Journals?
    How many have you published or at least studied?
    I'm just curious, most people with half a brain would not touch something like this!!

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)