Finding Bigfoot Stumped by Florida Flir Footage
When it comes to footage, the Finding Bigfoot team usually figures it out. When it comes to the FLIR footage captured by Stacy Brown Sr and Jr in Florida, not only does it leave the team stumped, but even group skeptic Ranae is left without an explanation.
For reference, here is the original Stacy Brown thermal footage.
FIRSTY!!
ReplyDeleteI have always loved this one. Thinker Thunker please do a breakdown and measure it out with the "green team" so we can see it with the others!
ReplyDeleteI'll do a breakdown for you CHICK.......... All fake!
DeleteI want to see it with the green lines Anthony- I simply must see it with those green lines!
DeleteSeriously- I must! I bet it fits.
I hope Thinker Thunker stays as far away from this footage as possible. He only breaksdown known hoaxes and calls them real. Anyone that agrees with him is a brain dead MORON.
DeleteFrom what I have seen I would agree.
DeleteOh how Thinker Thunker loves his little lines.
DeleteDavis... Here's a proper breakdown;
Delete"Only at the smallest estimated statures can the figure be possibly considered human"... Meaning, if the approximated height of the subject came back within the human range, then this could then be considered 'normal human'.
"Using the above two measurements on frame 9, I arrived at a height of 93.4 inches (7 ft 9 in) and 103.1 in (8 ft 7 in). Using the two measurement methods above for frame 10 of the video, I arrived at a height of 107.7 inches (8 ft 11.7 in) and 101.3 in (8 ft 5.3 in). The average of all four of these results is about 8 ft 5 in."
-Cliff Barrackman
10:04... So do you when you're boasting Pate's lined up images of Patty... That don't line up.
(Pffft)
Yes, at that height you have a problem with it being a person in a suit. You run into a lot of problems getting a person to mimic something that tall.
DeleteWere is the DNA evidence and the body???? Just one non-burry video or photo is all I'm asking for. Man made it to the moon, and 2 miles under the sea but can't find an animal/human in the woods?
ReplyDeleteThere has been DNA evidence. It's ususally rated human and unknown. The problem is without a type species to match it to one can't declare what it is.
DeleteI agree with Dr. Meldrum that bigfoot is a relict hominid, and being a species of man it will show a lot of DNA that matches ours.
I notice the long arms on that thing. It doesn't look like a man. It is either a hoax or the real deal, there is no in between. It had the typical slight forward lean as opposed to the more erect posture of humans. Also the bent knees. They bend their legs at a stronger angle than humans do.
Yes agreed D Dover. I cant get over the bend in the knee - which looks very much like Patty, and the length of the arms.
DeleteDavis... There is 150 years worth of giant human skeletal remains documented in the US, whilst I'm not so sure that the available footage is as blurry as you would 'prefer' it?
Deletehttp://www.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Munns-%20Meldrum%20Final%20draft.pdf
You're not another one of these rhetorical types now, are you? I'll also add that there have been plenty found, merely none caught.
If she can't explain it, it must be a bigfoot.
ReplyDeleteYes indeed - if the show's token skeptic (and I'm using that word VERY loosely here) is stumped by what amounts to just another video of a blurry figure then, oh my gosh, it validates ever footer's belief. Of course it's a given the others will buy into just like they do everything else.
DeleteI wouldn't be too concerned what she thinks, I would actually look at the data under analysis, like most logical people do. It's a matter of 'belief', a trust, a faith, or confidence outside of supporting evidence, that in the face of analysed data that point to a subject way outside of the normal human height, that people should insist that there is nothing worthy of consideration here.
DeleteStill waiting...
DeleteFor Domino's to open... Yes we know.
DeleteHi Chick!
ReplyDelete; ) Hey there BigfootStudent!
DeleteOne can analyze this video to death (so to speak) and in the end it's just another crappy video, but this time instead of a blurry out of focus color video, it's just a green figure crossing between trees and it does not get us one bit closer to confirming this species exists.........
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete?........
DeleteSorry, you're quite right, I'll edit that...
DeleteActually... Very few people have "analysed the video to death", that's the problem here. If people jumping to a conclusion that this is a hoax due to the circular argument that Bigfoot is a hoax, and are wielding a preconceived preference for the source and it's proponents as hoaxers... Then sure, it's been "analysed to death" alright. When you actually take the time to analyse the data in the footage, it at the very least points to a scenario that is worthy of significantly more consideration.
But you would know that... As you've "analysed it to death", right?
It would be all the more iteresting if an independent qualified group said it was 8.5feet
ReplyDeleteNo... They'd just be branded as Sasquatch enthusiasts and deemed untrustworthy.
DeleteWhat would be interesting is if we had a specimen.
DeleteHoe could anyone disagree with you?
DeleteRanae, is far from being the brightest bulb in the woods!
ReplyDeleteMight be the manliest though.
DeleteWhy is Matt making himself look like such a doofus?
ReplyDelete