Bigfoot Messes with Fire


From Paranormal Junkie comes an amazing bigfoot account from the 19th century. The person in the story says he observed the bigfoot messing with sticks in his campfire.

Comments

  1. A good chunk of anti-ED tabs on the internet are passable. They actually work for 8 mins, in case you're lucky enough.
    Check this URL, get more biting information all the other businesses and qualify for a reasonable price tag from our business!

    http://btotal.pt/wp-content/cache/tmp/ajax_newsletter.inc.php?am9rZXJqZXdlaUBhb2wuY29t

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have abused my butthole diameter in anticipation of my filthy dirty interlude with Bigfoot (of the anal kind),However after decades of frustrated disappointment I need a PILL that will fix "LOOSEASSHOLETITUS" I pray your PILL can help!

      Delete
  2. I always wonder when they refer to these reports as "well documented" exactly what that encompasses. We have lots of anecdotal newspaper reports but how reliable are they? Is it simply a reporter relating a story of what was told to them? We see stories of this nature all the time even today and yet with all these reports and sightings there still is not one shred of absolute proof that is accepted. I would think that is reason enough to put doubt in anyone's mind.

    I know this dates me but the narrator in the above clip sure sounds like Casey Kasem to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But there is a shred of proof. And to anyone willing to acknowledge it, these reports are impossible to hoax in the context of where said evidence sits chronologically. It is therefore another tick on the tally chart of anecdotal data that accompanies physical evidence that would be good enough to document the existence of any other mammal.

      Delete
    2. All I can say is being a woman I have always had delishishily filthy thoughts of a Bigfoot attacking me analy! It seems nothing wants my CLAM?
      Hope that answers your question curious!

      Delete
    3. What you consider proof is obviously not enough to convince the world at large of Bigfoot's existence. The further a report goes back in time the more dubious I am about it's accuracy. I agree physical proof is the best chance of proving a case however it has to be strong enough to remove all doubt of the majority who are experts in their field. Impossible to hoax? That's a pretty bold statement when you consider how clever us humans can be.

      Delete
    4. “Proof” equates to a body and a subsequent classification... But proof of a mammal being in a particular environment is the tracks it leaves. By this I can make a pretty good claim that a “shred of proof” has already been achieved. The “world at large” isn’t aware of the current level of evidence, which to most of them is summed up by what they manage to catch on Finding Bigfoot.

      To elaborate, it’s not logical that reports of the same creature preceding the physical evidence that substantiates them, are hoaxes. It would mean hoaxers would have to guess up the same hominin that appears to end up existing due to repeatable physical evidence turning up hundreds of years down the line. I doubt they’re THAT clever.

      Delete
    5. ikdummy is hoping most people gloss over the fact that Native Americans didn't have a written language and there were no written reports by Native Americans dating back hundreds of years, much less thousands of years like that sick oddball gets off repeating as fact.

      Delete
    6. Very true 3:56, since iktomi's brain functionality is at such a LOW WATTAGE the imbecile tends to project his strange fantasy's to everybody and everything!! WHAT A STUPID DUMBCLUCK!! AHAAA HAA AHAAA HA HA HAAA HA!

      Delete
    7. According to Mike B. and Leon, Iktomi/Joe is a lonely loser with no life or friends in the real world. This blog is everything to him as sad as that is to imagine. Mike B and Leon were so creeped out that they were forced to block the poor boob from emailing them.

      Delete
    8. I’ve never claimed that Native Americans ever had a written language... But an anecdote from European immigrants published in a newspaper, that’s contemporary to that of long-standing Native oral histories is profound. Here’s a link to a comment section about Native oral histories and things like the Mayak Dadat pictographs, which is a form of documentation;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/bigfoot-spotted-during-bonfire.html?m=0

      Don’t you think it’s slightly audacious when you think you’re the “alpha male” on a blog where you talk to yourself all day?

      Delete
    9. I beg all of you,Don't let so called friends (iktomi/joe) manipulate you into DryShoving
      Louisville Sluggers up your Asshole, In preparation for a intimate encounter(of the Anal kind) with the Big Hairy Man!
      Whaaa,Whaaaa haaa Whaaaa!
      I feel so used and LOOSE!
      ;~{©}

      Delete
    10. What is your proof that the Mayak Datat pictographs are of bigfoot? One of the characters looks like it's wearing a burqa. Is that proof that it is?

      What is your proof that any post on this thread other than 3:56 and this post is me? Proof, ikdummy.

      Delete
    11. My proof is the anthropological research that’s been conducted on those pictographs. With the word of the natives who are affiliated with those pictographs attesting to them being of “hairy man”. Again... if you’d have read the link I provided, you’d have learned something.

      My proof that you are the same person is here;
      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/the-dogman-episode.html
      ... Where I’ve yet again exposed your two writing styles, as well as being a cyber-stalker-pervert. I’ve exposed you as a psychopath too many times to count. Just like on the latest RMSO thread where you spent almost a whole day arguing with yourself and telling yourself to “shaddap”... In an attempt to play some weird mind games with the people you’re attempting to impersonate. And even though one of the people you’re impersonating had chimed in weeks ago to declare that no such feud is even ongoing.

      Seek help, there’s something wrong with you.

      Delete
    12. Steven Str*ufertSunday, September 3, 2017 at 7:16:00 PM PDT

      Actually, Kelly Shaw, Ganglian, and I are all on "stand down," so whatever is being said now is the site troll(s).

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/09/monte-cristo-bigfoot-trail-camera.html?m=0

      Delete
    13. ^ Give it up you site troll.

      Delete
    14. You are looney tunes, ikdummy. You do not understand that you can not write something into existence, bigfoot or your other nonsense...

      You are creating narratives, not reality. Things that makes sense to you and that you can debate about but are not real. That is what you are about.

      Delete
    15. Again... You substantiate historical AND modern anecdotes with physical evidence. Which there is an abundance when considering this hominin. Try and actually read the comments of others before allowing those sausage fingers to press “publish”.

      Since you’re an authority on reality, care to explain why the physical evidence for those anecdotes doesn’t stand... and where your Skinwalker-squatch fits in with all this?

      Delete
    16. MAYAK DATAT: THE HAIRY MAN PICTOGRAPHS
      Kathy Moskowitz Strain
      U.S. Forest Service, Stanislaus National Forest, 19777 Greenley Road, Sonora, CA 95370

      ABSTRACT. The purpose of this article is to examine the association of prehistoric pictographs with contemporary stories told by the Tule River Indians about Hairy Man. Located on the Tule River Indian Reservation, the Painted Rock Pictographs are approximately 1000 years old. According to members of the tribe, the pictographs depict how various animals, including Hairy Man, created People. Other stories tell why Hairy Man lives in the mountains, steals food, and still occupies parts of the reservation. Since the Tule River Indians equate Hairy Man to Bigfoot, the pictograph and stories are valuable to our understanding of the modern idea of a hair-covered giant.

      http://www2.isu.edu/rhi/pdf/Mayak%20Datat%20Hairy%20Man%20Pictographs-1.pdf

      ... there we go Stuey, go learn something.

      Delete
    17. ikdummy, I never believed in bigfoot EVER, skinwalker or otherwise, but you go on about your narrative. Paste your evidence or quote but it's not me. Just silly. I'm from Leeds, too? Right, ikdummy? How can you be on the fence when you were 100% sure? Does 100% certainty shift in ikdummy-land?

      A burqa pictograph is not a Bigfoot, ikdummy. You perpetually bob and weave with this nonsense and eventually revert back to plaster. Bigfoot is a whole lot of nothing. At BFE, you have the people that laugh at you, the people that used to believe but no longer do, the fantasy bound "superfriends", and the neurotic idiot that STILL thinks a person with a degree writing about something makes it incontestable. If you were educated and knew other educated people you'd know they can be as wrong as anyone else... but wave an "official" report in front of ikdummy's face and that's all "he" needs. Dummy.

      Delete
    18. Like I said Stuey... I have exposed you a million times. Literally too many times to count. You are Stuey, who spends his days TRYING to make fun out of “Bigfoot” yet believes they are paranormal. Plays “Bigfoot doesn’t exist” just for attention as he spends way too much time on the internet for real, healthy interaction. Lacks any affection in his life and was likely abused by his mother.

      Unfortunately, Stuey, your unqualified cries for a perverse version of cyber-company do not even begin to challenge the research of an anthropologist who’s worked first hand with natives in Northern California. There is nothing that I’m “bobbing and weaning”, because I provided a source that substantiates what I’ve said. That’s a reference, to you who’s so “educated” that you never even knew the significance of one. And when I want to substantiate that even more so, I’ll reference track impressions. Referring to them as mere “plaster”, again doesn’t even begin to challenge their credibility. People with degrees & PhD’s is what makes the scientific world go around, Stuey. It’s what the peer review process adheres to. What’s incontestable; is repeatable science... And it’s the logic of a real circular logic dullard who claims that evidence that can’t be contested, must lack credibility.

      (Cringe)

      And are we pretending to know educated people as well now? Just like we pretend to know Mike B and Leon? If there are any people left frequenting his place, Stuey, they’re laughing at the old psycho who spends each and every day of his life talking to himself on a blog, with a mental ball & chain that is Joe.

      Delete
    19. ... Oh, and who also reports his own filthy comments to blogger.

      (Creased)

      Delete
    20. 1st and 3rd paragraph are nonsense. You conflate every anon poster. Utter crap. Shame on you. Poor ikdummy.

      2nd paragraph. KMS does what she does with a total bigfoot perspective, much less bias. Why not post a perspective on Capitalism by a communist while you're at it? Are you REALLY that dumb?

      Delete
    21. Like I said... My proof that you are the same person is here;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/the-dogman-episode.html

      No... Native Americans do what they do with their oral histories in perspective, Kathy just documents it. If you don’t like it, take the time to pick it apart. But you are too stupid to provide any substance to whatever you publish here, aren’t you? You’re just a phoney old man who’s probably starting to believe all fantasies & lies after innumerable hours of lonely time getting drunk at your desktop. Someone who talks to himself 24/7 doesn’t have any authority when it comes to anthropology, I’m afraid. Your uneducated word against a whole culture, doesn’t cut it... Did you have the audacity to use the word “bias”?

      Delete
    22. I'm supposed to read your link to convince myself that someone that is not me is me? Classic ikdummy.

      ikdummy, no one is going to spend time putting out all the crazy "proof" fires perpetrated by bigfoot believers. "Evidence" will just keep piling up like maneuer. In the US, bigfooters are fringe crazies. 10,000 alleged 10 foot tall, 800 lb apeman and you obsess on anecdotes and plaster. Fool.

      Delete
    23. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    24. 10:15

      Remove that nonsense, ikdummy.

      Delete
    25. No... you’re meant to open the link and remember just the other day when I b-slapped you.

      Argh yes, of course... Because nobody has mounted a remotely significant challenge to such anthropological data, it must mean that it’s definitely all BS. Only in the world of an uneducated dullard try-hard, does a whole culture represent a shortfall in anthropological data. You adhere to so many logical fallacies, it’s just such easy pickings. You are so embarrassingly out of your depth, I think you’re just resigned to publishing anything now, just to see if one more comment can at least aggravate, eh Stuey? Thing is Stuey... only one of us will embark on a 24/7 Gollum campaign after this. Tell me, where do Skinwalker-squatches fit in your “fringe crazies” version of events?

      Oh... and one of the most fundamental tools to field biology is documenting the presence of mammals, and biologists do that by casting track impressions. The method is fundamental to field studies and wilderness surveys. Yeah, I’m gonna obsess about plaster for a good while yet, Stuey... Might even cut & paste you a few more links to remind you how stupid you are.

      I know how you hate that.

      : (

      Delete
    26. Remove my nonsense? Saying goodbye to you was a little premature, I think I’ll stick around a little longer and contribute to your emotional problems.

      What ya think?

      Delete
    27. Maybe some of my alleged "other personalities" that believe in bigfoot will fill your void, ikdumm-dumm....

      Delete
    28. That didn’t make any sense, oh “educated one”... You flustered or something?

      Delete
  3. You want proof, I have all the proof you will ever need !
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5YGZp8sFYA
    beyond kaboom !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have to admit DS that's the best proof of a shadow on a tree i have ever seen. xx

      Delete
    2. Jealous PIB ? just because you have zero proof doesn't mean you have to be critical of mine. Pathetic !
      Try to replicate this one then. No way the camera goes all blurry like this for no reason
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgEzmegAi94

      Delete
    3. Yes good Dr, let's have some drinks together and blur the camera too

      Delete
    4. Women get jealous if you don't let them watch

      Delete
    5. This site has become a huge joke allowing this filth on it. You are all one step closer to being engulfed in fire and brimstone .enjoy your eternal damnation in hell !

      Delete
    6. ^ 110% correct And I'm dam bloody proud mate.

      Joe

      Delete
    7. The proper link I meant to paste at 4:19 is in fact;

      http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.co.uk/2017/11/welcome-to-squatch-zone.html

      Delete
  4. I can fit a lot of long thick "crows" in my flappy mouth...flap, flap, flap, delicious
    Joe

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Samurai Chatter: Have you used it in the field?

BREAKING: Finding Bigfoot Production Company Seeks Filming Permit In Virginia

Bigfoot injured by a forest fire was taken away and hidden by the authorities, not even Robert Lindsay can top this story